The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of biology
— Jaan Aru (@jaaanaru) June 2, 2023
We raise three arguments (neural complexity, Umwelt & 'skin in the game') to suggest that AI systems are not conscious and will not be in the near future.
w @mattlark @jmacshine https://t.co/xzw0XL80S7 pic.twitter.com/c188Lv7hPt
Abstract of the article linked above:
Interactions with large language models have led to the suggestion that these models may be conscious. From the perspective of neuroscience, this position is difficult to defend. For one, the architecture of large language models is missing key features of the thalamocortical system that have been linked to conscious awareness in mammals. Secondly, the inputs to large language models lack the embodied, embedded information content characteristic of our sensory contact with the world around us. Finally, while the previous two arguments can be overcome in future AI systems, the third one might be harder to bridge in the near future. Namely, we argue that consciousness might depend on having 'skin in the game', in that the existence of the system depends on its actions, which is not true for present-day artificial intelligence.
No comments:
Post a Comment