tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6535481649727720492.post7658904782879596014..comments2024-03-27T21:43:02.451-04:00Comments on NEW SAVANNA: Harman on Literary Criticism, CuriousBill Benzonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08360044945265178991noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6535481649727720492.post-72808614294449689512012-09-17T17:57:25.785-04:002012-09-17T17:57:25.785-04:00Dan Green replies to Harman here:
http://noggs.ty...Dan Green replies to Harman here:<br /><br />http://noggs.typepad.com/oncriticsandcriticism/2012/09/the-object-of-criticism.html<br /><br />Harman replies to Green here:<br /><br />http://doctorzamalek2.wordpress.com/2012/09/17/on-ooo-and-new-criticism/Bill Benzonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08360044945265178991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6535481649727720492.post-46356002928869143292012-08-23T17:54:23.268-04:002012-08-23T17:54:23.268-04:00I find it very hard to believe that objects/texts&...I find it very hard to believe that objects/texts' character can change.<br /><br />Is that what we mean by point of view? that's then the projection of the object on the viewer nothing changes in the character of the object<br /><br />is that what we mean by breaking an object into two? then that's two different objects<br /><br />I think the whole idea is a sham and brings us back iksigmahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063903859058172931noreply@blogger.com