Monday, March 23, 2026

The war: The blockage of shipping and the destruction of LPG processing could bring long-term economic damage

The game has changed.

From the moment the United States and Israel attacked Iran, the nightmare scenario for the global economy that most people talked about was the closing of the Strait of Hormuz, the most important choke point for oil on the planet.

But a different and more disturbing nightmare began to unfold with direct attacks on the backbone of the Persian Gulf region’s energy production: the prospect of millions of dollars’ worth of long-term damage to facilities that supply a critical portion of the world’s natural gas.

Now, instead of wondering if the war would last for days or weeks, officials and economists are speculating about effects that could last for months and years.

“We have moved from stopping transit, which is a temporary measure, to attacking infrastructure, which has long-term effects,” said David Goldwyn, a former U.S. diplomat and Energy Department official.

This new phase of the war began Wednesday, when Iran carried out a retaliatory missile strike on Ras Laffan, Qatar’s vast energy complex. That target produces roughly a fifth of the world’s liquefied natural gas, a transportable fuel used to heat homes, cook food, power factories and generate electricity throughout Asia and Europe. [...]

The attacks showed that despite Iran’s relative weaknesses, the country is exerting enormous leverage over the global economy. By using small-scale, low-cost weapons to counter highly sophisticated and expensive missile systems, Mr. Goldwyn said, the Iranians “have demonstrated a long-term threat to be able to attack infrastructure throughout the Gulf.” [...]

Analysts at the energy consulting firm Wood Mackenzie have already warned that $200 a barrel is not outside the realm of possibility in 2026, up from about $73 before the war.

“I couldn’t fathom we would not start seeing economies fall into a recession with energy prices at that point,” Mr. Miller said. [...]

Though oil tends to grab headlines, the supply of natural gas in many ways is at the heart of the economic fallout from the intensified fighting in the Gulf this past week.

The facilities for processing liquefied natural gas, or L.N.G., are far less numerous than oil plants. Qatar’s, the world’s biggest, has not been operating for weeks, and is damaged. That also affects the price and availability of critical materials like fertilizer and helium, a byproduct of natural gas that is used to make semiconductor chips. [...]

Yet after years being whipsawed by a global pandemic, supply chain breakdowns and painful inflation, governments are limited — by depleted budgets and daunting debt loads — in their ability to respond to another crisis.

There's more at the link.

1 comment:

  1. Bill, from the NYTimes article (paywalled so I only see first five paragraphs) there are two separate yet same category scenarios - "for the global economy" [1a] & "the nightmare scenario for the global economy" [1b] - scenarios:
    1a; "the closing of the Strait of Hormuz"
    1b; ."long-term damage to facilities that supply a critical portion of the world’s natural gas."

    The far worse imo, than oil & gas infrastructure damage is to be found in [2];
    "The South Pars Pulse: Why the ‘Energy War’ is Actually a Thermodynamic Singularity" by Steven J. Newbury [2]......
    2; ""The far greater threat is uncontained venting of raw methane (CH4)." [2]

    Where does all the gas go after an explosion?

    In light of [2], revised NYTimes headline:
    War’s Attacks on Energy STORAGE Could RELEASE SO MUCH METHANE and Turn Economic Shock Into Long-Term  Damage OF OUR PLANET. (Taking Long-Term as 20 years)

    I really hope NADER NABHANI, 2 MOJTABA ESFANDYARI [1] are alive, and monitoring and lobbying against damage!
    Tldr; one mixing tank explosion - don't be nearby when it is hit, which is the type of damage the "War’s Attacks on Energy Could Turn Economic Shock Into Long-Term Damage" [1]  is talking about. No mention of ""South Pars/North Dome holds an estimated 1,800 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. ... The far greater threat is uncontained venting of raw methane (CH4)." [2]

    This is the type of damage the [1] New Yorker talks of;
    [1] ANALYZING THE CONSEQUENCES OF MIXTURE RELEASE IN THE SOUTH PARS GAS FIELD DEVELOPMENT IN IRAN-
    A CASE STUDY
    1 NADER NABHANI, 2 MOJTABA ESFANDYARI
    Professor of Petroleum University of Technology, Abadan, Iran

    Abstract - ..., but according to the observations and In this article, consequences and conditions of leak of one mixture tank in Propane Treatment And Draying Unit (contain: Ethane,
    Propane, Isobutene, n-butane, Hydrogen sulfide) which is in service at South Pars Gas Field Development (Phase 13) is
    investigated using PHAST software. This paper describes the analysis and results of a PHAST study conducted on mixture
    tank in South Pars Gas Field (Phase 13).
    ...
    https://worldresearchlibrary.org/up_proc/pdf/10-142390786332-35.pdf

    [2]
    A wild scenario??? .. a new one on me... ymmv. Tldr... keep it in the tank!

    "The South Pars Pulse: Why the ‘Energy War’ is Actually a Thermodynamic Singularity"
    Steven J. Newbury
    Mar 18, 2026
    ...
    "The Methane Blind Spot
    "South Pars/North Dome holds an estimated 1,800 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. When upstream infrastructure of this magnitude is ruptured, the result is not just fire and smoke (particulate matter), which the environmental NGOs are currently monitoring. The far greater threat is uncontained venting of raw methane (CH4).
    "Methane possesses a Global Warming Potential (GWP) roughly 80 times that of CO2 over a 20-year horizon. However, in the immediate aftermath of a massive, concentrated release, the ‘horizon’ is not 20 years. It is measured in weeks.
    Because the Persian Gulf is a topographically and atmospherically semi-enclosed basin, a massive methane release will not immediately disperse globally. It will pool, creating a localised, hyper-concentrated greenhouse blanket.
    ...
    https://theuaob.substack.com/p/the-south-pars-pulse-why-the-energy

    [1] "The game has changed." Business as Usual, no Black Swan Event considered.
    [2] "However, in the immediate aftermath of a massive, concentrated release, the ‘horizon’ is not 20 years. It is measured in weeks." Black Swan. But is it??? Wikipedia... "... Taleb provides the example of the 9/11 attacks, which were a black swan for many, but not for its planners and perpetrators.[3][4]"

    I hope we never find out.
    SD

    ReplyDelete