Tuesday, July 10, 2018

Interpreting Melania’s Jacket [#melaniasjacket #melania]

A couple of weeks ago First Lady Melania Trump was photographed in a jacket which had “I REALLY DON’T CARE, DO U?” written on the back. Chaos ensued. Well, not exactly chaos, but rampant speculation about what she meant by that statement.

The statement itself seems harmless enough, a vague undirected statement of detachment or nonchalance. But such a statement seems, on the surface, in conflict with the context in which she wore the jacked. In the photo above (to the left) she is boarding an airplane to fly to a detention center for immigrant children. The children’s families attempted an illegal border crossing, had been caught, and the children had been separated from their parents. This policy was (and is) enormously controversial and is strongly identified with her husband, President Donald Trump, who’d made cracking down on immigration a cornerstone of his policy. That controversy was at a fever pitch when the First Lady got on the plane.

Such a trip is ordinarily an expression of sympathy. But if the First Lady was sympathetic to the children, then why wear a jacket that expresses detachment on its back? Is she saying, in effect, that she’s not at all concerned about/for the children? If so, isn’t that a terrible thing? But then, isn’t her husband a terrible president? And thus the full force of anti-Trump sentiment became directed at Melania and her jacket.

Abstractly considered, it’s possible that she just grabbed the jacket on the way out the door without thinking about it. But, as the tweet above points out, she once made a living by wearing clothes for the camera. It seems unlikely that she’d be so cavalier. She had some intention, but what?

I surely don’t know. It’s possible that she had something specific in mind, for a specific audience. It’s also possible that she thought about it and picked that jacket on a purely intuitive basis, sure that it was just the thing, but without an explicit sense of what that thing is. I don’t know.

* * * * *

To what degree or in what way are literary texts like the writing on Melania’s jacket? So-called formalists have argued that literary texts contain their meaning within themselves. Hence we don’t need to know anything about the author or the historical context in order to determine the meaning of the text. But not all literary critics are formalists, not by a long shot. For these critics, context is essential.

In the case of Melania’s jacket context, yes, is essential. But it is not definitive, not for those of us without access to Melania’s mind. And maybe not even for Melania herself. She had a certain intention when she first put the jacket on and was photographed wearing it. Has that intention remain intact through the ensuring controversy?

2 comments:

  1. "In the case of Melania’s jacket context, yes, is essential. But it is not definitive, not for those of us without access to Melania’s mind. And maybe not even for Melania herself."

    I think context here is definitive. Its just the context shifts from one mind to another.

    But then I am a a situationist rather than a formalist so I would say that.

    Successes here would seem to be dependent on the ability of the words to make sense in the situation things find themselves in ( a mind which is not Melania's).

    Melania's mind does not contain the unlock its not where its been its where its going and in the case of America the future looks somewhat unpredictable and difficult to contain.

    In this respect it may very much reflect the moment in which it is found i.e a chaotic situation subject to dramatic and sudden alteration.

    It holds the moment because it reflects it and is able to alter in a hostile environment allowing it to move from one person to the next.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "In this respect it may very much reflect the moment in which it is found i.e a chaotic situation subject to dramatic and sudden alteration." YES.

      Delete