Showing posts with label improvise. Show all posts
Showing posts with label improvise. Show all posts

Saturday, January 10, 2026

Classical improvisation by a Danish American Jewish comedian, Victor Borge

I'm bumping this one to the top of the queue because 1) I want to, 2) it's my blog, and 3) Borge is wonderful.
Victor Borge never got the memo saying that classical musicians stopped improvising sometime during the middle of the 19th century. So, when a fiddle player wanted to perform a tune that Borge had heard, but never played, Borge simply improvised an accompaniment. It's a bit over the top at points, but then Borge is a comedian. Watch how the two men interact act with one another. There are points where one or the other doesn't quite know what's coming up, so they have to look and listen.
 
 
Pay attention at about 3:13, in a slow section (stuck in the middle of all the fast stuff). At about 3:43 Borge starts a nice counter melody; from 3:54 to the end it's nuts, with a nice counter melody in octaves at about 4:02. Notice the nice hesitation for the very last note, a skillful touch.

Thursday, September 4, 2025

Playful conversational riffing is the way to connect

Maya Rossignac-Milon and Erica Boothby, You’re Probably Doing Small Talk Wrong, NYTimes, Sept. 4, 2025.

There’s a moment in human connection that defies easy explanation — that sudden, electric feeling when you meet someone and feel your minds merge. It happened to the two of us when we met at a psychology symposium: Our small talk during a break quickly gave way to playful theories about coffee drinkers versus tea drinkers. We went to find seats together, unaware that this conversation was the start of a decade-long collaboration and friendship.

Where does that spark come from, exactly? What makes someone feel like a lifelong friend after just a couple of minutes? People tend to assume it’s similarity: that they are especially likely to hit it off with someone who shares their background or personality traits.

But in our research, we’ve found that many of the strongest bonds come less from pre-existing similarity and more from riffing playfully. In these moments, people create a little world that belongs just to them, a process we call “building a shared reality.” Collaborative riffs are surprisingly central to our mental well-being: They’re the glue that binds us together, adds color to our lives and gives us a sense of purpose.

And yet, our culture’s conversational rituals revolve not around playful co-creation, but around exchanging formalities.

The art of riffing:

Riffing doesn’t require being naturally funny or witty, just being attentive and embracing spontaneity. Like any conversational skill, it takes practice. When riffing, speakers resist the urge to counter every observation with their own separate example, instead building bridges to new ideas (“That reminds me of. …”) or tossing in a “Can you imagine if …?” They reference earlier parts of the conversation to create inside jokes (“Looking forward to our miniature potluck committee!”).

Riffing isn’t just for new acquaintances. Over time, it creates a feeling of having merged minds and inhabiting a private universe. Patti Smith described her relationship with her late husband as the “silent synchronization of the jewels and gears of a common mind.”

There's more at the link.

Wednesday, January 8, 2025

A classical musician who improvises? Who'd have thunk? [Gabriela Montero]

But you know, all this comes completely naturally to any half-way decent jazz musician. So much of the "gee whiz" aspect of this conversation is rather parochial. In the world of classical music, sure, this is all strange. But in jazz, not at all. All this stuff about Montero improvising without knowledge of music theory, that's just nonsense. Children chatter away without any knowledge of linguistics. Musicians who haven't been crippled by years of tutelage in the classical tradition find improvising to be utterly natural. All classical musicians could and should be like Montero. Alas...

From the YouTube page:

Gabriela Montero is an amazing pianist and improviser, perhaps even the best since Bach. In this work of art she will be interviewed by the one and only inglorious Aleksey and also be improvising on themes from famous movies like Star Wars by John Williams, Time from Inception and Boss Baby 2 by composer Hans Zimmer.

0:00 Introduction
1:04 "I turned 50 this year"
2:22 Childhood stories
4:33 Famously dumb concerning music theory
6:06 Gabriela and Aleksey improvising live in Geneve
https://oneaction.ch/en
https://karuna-shechen.org

7:49 Gabriela and Aleksey play again
8:40 Looking inside Gabriela's brain
11:50 "ExPatria" by Gabriela Montero
12:22 Latin Concerto by Gabriela Montero
13:15 Noteflight composing program
https://www.noteflight.com

13:20 Sibelius composing program
https://www.avid.com/sibelius

14:26 Plugging performances you WONT do
15:22 Music Traveler new streaming platform
https://www.musictraveler.com
https://www.musictraveler.tv f / musictraveler

17:37 Gabriela improvising introduction
18:10 Star Wars by John Williams - Aleksey shows theme
18:45 Star Wars by John Williams - Gabriela improvises
20:23 "Time" from Inception by Hans Zimmer - Aleksey shows theme
21:18 "Time" from Inception by Hans Zimmer - Gabriela improvises
23:25 "Boss Baby" by Hans Zimmer - Aleksey shows theme
24:24 "Boss Baby" by Hans Zimmer - Gabriela improvises
25:30 Goodbye to Gabi and her famous words of wisdom

Wednesday, December 25, 2024

The horror! The horror! A classical pianist improvises: Gabriela Montero

Time stamps:

0:00 A wolf in sheep's clothing
1:58 Improvisation No. 1
6:29 Improvisation No. 2
10:40 Improvisation No. 3
14:54 Martha Argerich's mentorship
16:36 Improvisation No. 4
22:14 Chopin & Piazzola Mashup Improvisation
28:05 Discovering who you are on stage
31:47 Saying vs Showing
34:11 Dare to be what you're not

After the 2nd improvisation she has some interesting remarks about her state of, shall we say, mind: “At that time of my life I felt very much like a caged animal. And this was kind of my coming out of my shell for a minute in that setting.”

Monday, December 2, 2024

Improvising on "Für Elise" in 17 ways [very illuminating]

0:00 Intro
0:14 Für Elise (original)
0:54 #1 Happy
1:40 #2 Sad
3:08 #3 Curious
4:09 #4 Tired
5:57 #5 Terrified
7:27 #6 Triumphant
8:21 #7 Confused
9:29 #8 Cranky
10:41 #9 Thankful
12:20 #10 Infuriated
13:45 #11 Tranquil
15:33 #12 Bored
17:26 #13 Silly
18:33 #14 Pessimistic
20:46 #15 Tender
22:50 #16 Drunk
24:38 #17 Rejuvenated

This video was filmed at the Prager Family Center for the Arts in Easton, Maryland, as part of a four-day residency with the Gabriela Montero Piano Lab presented by OAcademy, an initiative of the Orchestra of Americas Group offering elite training to talented young musicians from around the world. For more, visit: https://oacademy.live

Wednesday, August 28, 2024

Pianist Robert Levin improvises when he plays Mozart

Zachary Woolfe, A Pianist Who’s Not Afraid to Improvise on Mozart, NYTimes, Aug. 27 2024. The article opens:

Cadenzas are a concerto soloist’s time to shine: the moments when the rest of the orchestra dramatically drops out and a single musician gets the chance to command the stage.

For about half of Mozart’s piano concertos, cadenzas he wrote have been preserved, and those are what you usually hear in concerts and on recordings. Other composers later filled in the gaps with cadenzas that have also become traditional. Some performers write their own.

But 250 years ago, when Mozart was a star pianist, he wouldn’t have performed prewritten cadenzas — even ones he had composed.

“When Mozart wrote his concertos, they were a vehicle for his skills,” the pianist and scholar Robert Levin said by telephone from Salzburg, Austria — Mozart’s hometown — where he teaches at the Mozarteum University. “He was respected as a composer and lionized as a performer, but it was as an improviser that he was on top of the heap.”

Levin, 76, has long argued that Mozart, as a player, made up new cadenzas and ornaments in the moment. And he has sought to revive that spirit of improvisation in a landmark cycle of the concertos on period instruments, a 13-album project begun more than 30 years ago with the Academy of Ancient Music, led by Christopher Hogwood.

After a two-decade gap caused by record company budget cuts, and with the last installment finally released this summer, the cycle takes an invaluable place as the most complete survey of Mozart’s music for keyboard and orchestra.

There's much more at the link.

Friday, June 21, 2024

Improvisation and Ives || Fascinating discussion! [American music]

From the YouTube page:

The second installment of the Society's popular series of panels about Charles Ives, All the Way Around and Back! This very entertaining conversation features an in-depth look at the fascinating and even surprising convergences between the music and influence of Charles Ives and the history and current practice of jazz, big band, blues, rock, film music, and pop. Moderated by Judith Tick, the panel includes Jack Cooper, Bill Frisell, Eric Hofbauer, Ethan Iverson, Phil Lesh and David Sanford.

If you don't want to listen to the whole interview, which is a bit over two hours, start at about 1:33:19 where they play "The Alcotts" from Ive's Concord Sonata. Then listen to the conversation that follows, that ranges from Ives through Beethoven, Keith Jarrett, and John Williams, to parlor piano, on to Thelonious Monk and then to being a church organist, as Ives had been.

Friday, May 24, 2024

Hayato Sumino plays (the **** ouf of) Rhapsody in Blue

Sumino improvises throughout. Starting at 6:35 he plays a duet with himself on melodica. And at about 14:25 he plays a short upper register trill which, I'm told (there's a clip the points this out specifically), is an answer to a ringtone coming from somewhere in the audience.

You might want to compare this with Béla Fleck's banjo version, which I've linked here.

Thursday, May 2, 2024

Tyler Cowen talks with Coleman Hughes [trombone technique and the nature of improvisation]

Coleman Hughes on Colorblindness, Jazz, and Identity (Ep. 211), May, 2024. The scope of the conversation:

Coleman Hughes believes we should strive to ignore race both in public policy and in our private lives. But when it comes to personal identity and expression, how feasible is this to achieve? And are there any other individual traits we should also seek to ignore?

Coleman and Tyler explore the implications of colorblindness, including whether jazz would’ve been created in a color-blind society, how easy it is to disentangle race and culture, whether we should also try to be ‘autism-blind’, and Coleman’s personal experience with lookism and ageism. They also discuss what Coleman’s learned from J.J. Johnson, the hardest thing about performing the trombone, playing sets in the Charles Mingus Big Band as a teenager, whether Billy Joel is any good, what reservations he has about his conservative fans, why the Beastie Boys are overrated, what he’s learned from Noam Dworman, why Interstellar is Chris Nolan’s masterpiece, the Coleman Hughes production function, why political debate is so toxic, what he’ll do next, and more.

I'm only part-way into the conversation, but I assume the whole thing is worthwhile as both interlocutors and interesting and intelligent. I was struck by remarks that Coleman made about J.J. Johnson:

COWEN: Now, before we get to your book, I have just some random questions for you. What have you learned from J.J. Johnson?

HUGHES: What is most interesting about J.J. Johnson is that he was an extreme perfectionist. What people don’t realize about J.J., at least people that aren’t deep connoisseurs, is that most of his solos on his records were prepared. To an extent, that is not true of his other contemporaries like Charlie Parker, Dizzy Gillespie, etc. Most of their solos were truly improvised. Like if you go to the alternate takes on those records, it’s a different solo. If you go to J.J.’s alternate takes, it’s almost the same solo.

I think that, rather than be a bug, that was a feature of his success. Because if you consider the challenges required to make the trombone into a bebop instrument — which nobody thought was possible before J.J. Johnson did it — it’s a catch-22 because the level of perfectionism you would have had to have in order to be the first successful bebop trombone player would also preclude you from being a truly improvisatory musician, which is generally characteristic of jazz musicians.

COWEN: Are most of your trombone solos prepared?

HUGHES: No. But, in a way, I benefit —

This is why you can’t compare modern players to players of the past. I benefit enormously from having studied and learned all of, or many of, J.J. Johnson’s solos. There were things he had to invent that are now second nature to most trombonists, which make it easier to improvise in that style than it would have been for him.

COWEN: Physically, what’s the hardest thing about playing the trombone?

HUGHES: It’s actually not the slide. The slide, in my view — that’s what attracted me to the trombone, the fact that you push and pull rather than pressing buttons or valves, and that’s what makes it distinct. But the slide motion is not actually the trickiest thing about it. The trickiest thing about it is the same thing that’s tricky about every other brass instrument, which is the embouchure. That’s what separates great trumpet players from poor trumpet players.

In my view, the finger technique is not nearly the hardest part. It’s always the small muscles of the mouth and coordinating those to play the instrument effectively.

I'm curious about Coleman's statement about the embouchure being most difficult aspect of trombone playing rather than the slide. As a trumpet player I understand about the embouchure. However, Hughes makes that statement just after having discussed J.J. Johnson, where he points out that Johnson seems to have prepared his solos so meticulously that "most of his solos on his records were prepared. [...] If you go to J.J.’s alternate takes, it’s almost the same solo."

So, just what are "the challenges required to make the trombone into a bebop instrument"? I would have thought it had to do with the slide, not moving it back and forth, but rather getting clear articulation between notes at a very rapid clip – a requirement of bebop. When you're playing a valved instrument there's a break in the air stream between one pitch and the next, so it's easy to separate them – unless both notes have the same fingering, which happens often enough. That's not the case with trombone, where the airstream is uninterrupted. In order to play rapid bebop lines cleanly I have always assumed – I've never talked with a jazz trombonist about this – that it was necessary to introduce some kind of tongued articulation and that's what's difficult, the tonguing AND the coordination of the tonguing with both slide movement and embouchure changes. I just did a search on "jj johnson double tongue." If you look at what comes up, you'll see lots of mention of tonguing.

As for improvisation and jazz, I think that's tricky. Back in 2018 pianist Ethan Iverson interviewed Carla Bley. She talked of having met Louis Armstrong:

I, of course, revere him for the same reason as I revere Count Basie. Everything is perfect. Every note, all the phrasing, is perfect. He worked on it. He told me he didn’t have that ethic that the rest of the musicians have, always coming up with something new, never repeating themselves. He just worked on a solo until he had it, and that was really freeing for a person like me, used to writing everything down. I couldn’t really enjoy improvising.

Thus, it seems that when Armstrong performed, the solos he played are more like un-notated composition than "true" improvisation. Back in 1973 Joachim Berendt suggested, on the basis of recordings, that un-noted composition was common in the big band era (The Jazz Book, pp. 193, 132-33) and Gunther Schuller made similar observations (Swing, pp. 165, 173-176, 445, 481). Thus if you listen to various versions of “Take the A Train” that Duke Ellington recorded, you’ll hear Cootie Williams playing pretty much the same trumpet solo. Was he doing what Armstrong had done, playing the solo he liked, or was he simply playing what the fans obligated him to play because they wanted to hear what was on the record? As far as I know, the issue hasn't been properly investigated, though I haven’t looked into it in awhile.

Note: The stuff after JJ is from a blogpost: Some varieties of improvisation, from New Orleans, through bebop, to Cage, and to K-Pop.

Wednesday, May 1, 2024

Adam Neely is not worried about AI musicians out-jamming human musicians

AI is Doomed to Fail the Musical Turing Test

0:00 Intro
3:54 Part I - Musical Turing Tests
10:56 Part II - Thinking Like a Human
20:17 Part III - "Not music"

Sunday, March 3, 2024

Six improvisors on the continuum

There is an unfortunate tendency to talk of improvisation in jazz as a "pure" act of spontaneous creation, of playing something unlike you'd ever played before in your life. Not so. Every skilled improvisor has practiced and practiced and practiced some more. They're got a repertoire of licks and tactics that they draw on while playing a solo. It's better to think of a continuum between pure composition, which always has room for interpretive license, and pure improvisation, which never actually happens.

In this clip we see six very different musicians improvise against the same backing track. Each tells us something about the process they went through to prepare. Some prepared more extensively than others. Each is somewhere on that continuum between pure improv and deliberate composition. It would be interesting to hear each pianist play another chorus a week later, but without any extra preparation. Would there be any similarities between that chorus and the one in the video?

Each of these musicians has a channel on YouTube; they're listed in the notes at YouTube.

Friday, November 3, 2023

Jamming for Peace [Iraq in 2003]

I wrote this on March 24, 2003, two days after the event it describes, a protest march in Manhattan. We were protesting invasion of Iraq. In view of the current state of war in the Middle East I thought it worth bumping to the top of the queue.
It was Saturday, March 22, 2003, the day of the big peace demonstration. I got off the PATH train in mid-town Manhattan at about 12:30. Five minutes later I was in Harold Square, home of Macy's, checking out the demo. I’d agreed to hook up with Charlie Keil between 1 and 1:30, so I had a few minutes to get a feel for the flow.

People filled Broadway from side-to-side for block after block. Here and there I heard drums and bells and a horn player or two, but no organized music. Shortly after the Sparticists passed (they’re still around?) I noticed a trombonist standing on the sidewalk. Just as I was about to invite him to come with Charlie and me he headed out into the crowd. I let him go his way as I went mine.

I arrived at 36th and 6th – our meeting point a block away from the demo route – at about 1. Charlie arrived about five minutes later, with two German house guests. We were to meet with other musicians and then join the demo, providing some street music for the occasion. None of the other musicians had arrived by 1:45, so we waded into the crowd searching for the drummers we could hear so well – one of our musicians arrived about ten minutes later and managed to find us in the demo. We made our way to the drummers and starting riffing along with them, Charlie on cornet and me on trumpet. I could see one guy playing bass drum, another on snare, a djembe player or two, and various people playing bells, a small cooking pot, plastic paint cans. Then I heard some wild horn playing off to the left. I looked and saw the one-armed cornetist I’d seen playing in Union Square in the days after 9/11. Charlie and I made our way toward him and joined up. Then I noticed two trumpeters and a trombonist a few yards behind us.

So there we were, a half dozen horns, perhaps a dozen percussion, all within a 20-yard radius. We’d come to the demo in ones, twos and threes, managed to home-in on one another’s sounds, and stayed in floating proximity for the two or three mile walk down Broadway to Washington Square. Sometimes we were closer, within a 5 or 6-yard radius, and sometimes we sprawled over 50 yards. The music was like that too, sometimes close, sometimes sprawled.
 
When the march slowed to a stop, one of the djembe players would urge the percussionists to form a circle. The horn players executed punctuating riffs as one person after another moved into the circle’s center to dance their steps. These young women clearly had taken African dance classes. When the demo started to move, the dancers dispersed into the crowd, the circle dissolved, and we starting moving forward.

Sometimes the music made magic. The drummers would lock on a rhythm, then a horn player – we took turns doing this – would set a riff, with the four or five others joining in on harmony parts or unison with the lead. At the same time the crowd would chant “peace now” between the riffs while raising their hands in the air, in synch. All of a sudden – it only took two or three seconds for this to happen – a thirty-yard swath of people became one. Horn players traded off on solos, the others kept the riffs flowing, percussionists were locked, and the crowd embraced us all. You walked with spring and purpose. Even as the crowd chanted “peace” I was feeling “Onward Christian Soldiers” and “Battle Hymn of the Republic” in my mind and in my step.

The tribe was rising.

Things got jammed up as we got to Waverly Place – the street that runs just north of Washington Square, the demo’s end. One of the cornet players looked off to the side. I followed his gaze and saw the trombonist I’d passed when I’d first reconnoitered the demo in Harold Square. His horn was pointed to the sky, slide pumping away, as he worked his way toward us. He settled into “All You Need Is Love” and the other horns joined him in sweet, crude, rough harmony. I was hearing John Lenon in my mind’s ear, along with the sardonic horn riffs answering the treacly refrain.

Leaving us wanting more, that’s how it ended.

Sunday, September 17, 2023

Cuban trumpet

I don’t know Cuban trumpeters like I know jazz trumpeters, so commentary will be light to non-existent.

Cuban Fantasy (Machito)

“Cuban Fantasy” seems to have be composed by Ray Bryant, and it seems like everyone in Latin music has recorded it. This recording is by Machito, who, with Mario Bauzá as musical director, is known for putting Cuban rhythms to big band arrangments, which he does here.

The trumpet solo starts at 2:40. Notice the “Summertime” lick at c. 3:43. I believe the trumpet soloist is Alfredo "Chocolate" Armenteros (see below for more Chocolate).

The unison phrase that’s used to end each chorus and the turn as a whole, it’s been driving me nuts for the last couple days.

Some guys (Cuba Feliz)

I know nothing about this, but it’s lots of fun. It seems to be some guys in Cuba playing their trumpets to, with, and at one another. The fun starts at about 1:17. Watch the gestures and they play their trumpets in the stairwell of their apartment building.

Listen to the different kinds of sounds. And the neighbors joining in with hand claps. Nice duet at sunset starting at 3:40. Listen to how they echo and harmonize with one another. A nice conversation.

El Manisero (Mario Bauza)

I don’t recognize the trumpet soloist. But I don’t think Chocolate quite has that upper register. The whole section is hot.

Alfredo "Chocolate" Armenteros

From Eddie Palmieri, “Columbia Te Canto,” on Lucumi, Macumba, Voodoo (1978). This is not your nana's salsa. Palmieri is taking it to a whole other place. This piece is longish, over 10 minutes. It starts slow, in an elegiac mood, and then shifts into a guanguancó rhythm, where it stays ‘till the end. Chocolate enters at about 3:04, playing call and response with the vocalist.

Listen to the masterful way he floats over the underlying rhythm. His trumpet line is very fluid, but thick, like honey. This outing ends at about 3:38. The ensemble does this and that, Eddie Palmieri gets in his licks on piano, and then they begin to ride it out. Chocolate enters at 7:54, and is joined by vocalists at 8:10.

Yuliesky González

You're on your own here. Yuliesky's hot hot hot!

Sunday, March 26, 2023

This is an EXCELLENT video about improvisation.

I particularly enjoyed the opening material about Charlie Parker. I didn't know it, but it wasn't surprising either. Here is a link to Thomas Owens' dissertation on Parker's improvisation

Timings for the video:

0:00 How Charlie Parker Improvised
0:35 What is a "motive"?
1:36 Parker's Language
1:56 Elan DARE intro
2:16 Myth 1 - Improv Is creating something brand new on the spot.
4:23 Myth 2 - You can't practice improvisation
4:55 Planning an improvisation
5:54 Different types improv
6:15 Myth 3 - Improvisations are unplanned
7:26 Myth 4 - Improv comes naturally to people
8:30 What can you do?
8:43 Tip 1
8:55 Tip 2
9:28 Tip 3
9:49 Tip 4
10:15 Tip 5 BYE 

There are a number of useful links on the YouTube page.

Monday, February 27, 2023

Rick Beato interviews the great Keith Jarrett

Beato's notes:

Keith Jarrett is an American jazz pianist and composer born in Allentown, Pennsylvania in 1945. He is considered one of the most influential and accomplished jazz musicians of his generation, having recorded dozens of albums as a solo artist and as a leader of various ensembles. Known for his virtuosic piano playing and improvisational skills, Jarrett has been recognized for his unique ability to blend elements of jazz, classical music, and world music into his compositions. He has collaborated with many of the world's top musicians and has received numerous awards throughout his career, cementing his place in the pantheon of jazz greats.

This is my interview with Keith Jarrett.

Special thanks to: Pat Ryan, Keith Williams, David Bendeth, Steve Cloud, Caroline Fontanieu, Martin Geyer, ECM Records and very special thanks to Akiko Jarrett.

It's all good, but pay particular attention to the section where Beato plays Jarrett a solo improvisation on Miles Davis's "Solar" that Jarrett had done in the 1980s. From that point to the end of the interview is superb. Excellent music – there's another piece of music after than. And an important document in music history.

Beato introduces that segment at about 31:01. Beato juxtaposes video of Jarrett listening NOW with video of Jarrett's playing THEN. The performance is masterful and entrancing. Notice how Jarrett played the piano with his whole body, often rising up from the piano bench and dancing at the keyboard – something he can no longer do as a consequence of strokes he suffered in 2018. Watch Jarrett's face as he listens.

Beato: That's riding the wave.

Jarrett: Wow, that's great.

Beato: That is really just amazing. It just all flow. Nothing is, is anything even going through your mind when you're playing. You're just channeling, right?

Jarrett: Yeah.

From the Wikipedia:

Jarrett's race has been a source of commentary by media and activists throughout his career, as he has reported being recurrently mistaken as a Black person. In a 2000 interview with Terry Gross, Jarrett relates an incident at the Heidelberg Jazz Festival in the Rhine-Neckar region of Germany when he was protested by Black musicians for something akin to cultural appropriation. He also tells of a separate moment in his career when black jazz musician Ornette Coleman approached him backstage, and "said something like 'Man, you've got to be black. You just have to be black.'" Jarrett replied "I know. I know. I'm working on it."

Me too, me too.

Check out my collection of anecdotes, Emotion and Magic in Musical Performance, Version 11.

Saturday, August 13, 2022

My Jazz Education 8: Learning to Improvise, Part 2 – the Buffalo years

Though I’ve written quite a bit here and there about my general experience as an improviser I’ve also written more specifically about learning to improvise in three previous posts:

My Early Jazz Education 6: Dave Dysert

My Jazz Education 7: Learning to Improvise, Part 1

Frank Foster in Buffalo

High school jazz [It wasn’t done]

Though Dave Dysert is one of the most important teachers I’ve ever had – he’s one of the five fathers to whom I dedicated my book on music, Beethoven’s Anvil – and he laid some of the foundations on which my improvisational skills rest, he never actually worked with me on improvisation. This seems strange in retrospect, but at the time it’s just how things were, as I remark in this recent post, High School jazz [it wasn’t done]. The Part 1 post covers what I learned up though my undergraduate years at Johns Hopkins and a couple of years beyond, which my major experience was in playing with a jazz-rock band, The Saint Matthew Passion. This post picks up with the dissolution of that band in the spring of 1971 or 1972 when the founders of the band – Jon, Mal, and Steve – graduated from Johns Hopkins.

I continued practicing the trumpet, which would have included improvising along with records. I don’t recall whether or not I had purchased any of the Jamey Aebersold play-along records at that time. These are records of jazz tunes played by a rhythm section, but without any horns. A horn player could then practice improvising along with the record. Whether or not I’d started working with such records, I eventually would and, in time, built up a modest collection.

In the Spring of 1973 I signed up for trumpet lessons in the adult preparatory division of the Peabody Conservatory in Baltimore. My teacher was Harold Rehrig, who had spent most of his career playing with the Philadelphia Symphony Orchestra. Though he had some familiarity with jazz – he knew of Dizzy Gillespie – he wasn't an improvisor. That's not why I was studying with him. I wanted to improve my technique. He helped me with that; in particular, he worked on my breathing. We also worked on the Haydn Trumpet Concerto, for which I composed two cadenzas.

Then it was off to Buffalo. I had been accepted into the Ph.D. program in the English Department at the State University of New York at Buffalo for the Fall of 1973. As I also wanted to continue working on jazz improvisation I checked the catalog and discovered that the music department listed a jazz improvisation workshop led by Frank Foster. I’d never heard of him, but looked him up in Leonard Feather’s Encyclopedia of Jazz and discovered that he’d spent a decade with Count Basie and then worked with Elvin Jones, Sarah Vaughan and others. He was free-lancing in New York and flew out to Buffalo to conduct the workshop (and, I assume, teach other courses).

At first I was very self-conscious in the workshop. (I didn’t take it for academic credit, but simply audited it.) To be sure, I’d had a lot of experience improvising solos in The Saint Matthew Passion. But that had been a jazz-inflected rock band. None of the tunes had complex chord changes; I was mostly improvising over one- and two-chord vamps. I assumed most of the players in the workshop would be music-majors. Could I hang with them?

Yes, after a bit. The workshop met for a single two- or three-hour session a week. There were, I don’t know, 20 or so players in the workshop at any one time, which was a bit crowded. It meant that no one got much playing time. We’d do two, maybe three, tunes in each session, with each person taking a solo. Frank would write a tune on the chalk board, melody and chord changes, explain important features of the tune, including how to relate scales to chords – “harmonic relevance” was Frank’s term – and we’d run it down.

I remember that in an early session, perhaps the first, we did Herbie Hancock’s “Maiden Voyage.” I thought I’d acquitted myself reasonably well. But another player in the workshop, a tenor sax playing, pointed out to me that another trumpet player was hitting the changes. Implying, of course, that I hadn’t been. Whoops! And double-whoops, because that tune doesn’t have complicated changes. I felt intimidated by another trumpet player in the workshop, Billy Skinner, because he was so good. I don’t know whether or not he was formally enrolled in the workshop or was just one of the local musicians who’d show up every now and then.

I’d write each tune down in a music notebook and then work on them. I often wrote out exercises based on the chord changes for a tune. We must have gone through I don’t know how many tunes in a semester; I believe I hung out in the workshop for at least two, if not three, semesters. At this point I don’t remember which tunes we covered, but there was “Blue Bossa,” “St. Thomas,” “Dexterity,” “Giant Steps,” and several of Frank’s tunes, including “Simone” and “Who’s That Rockin’ My Jazz Boat.”

I’m sure I hung out in that workshop my first two years at Buffalo (73-74, 74-75) and perhaps my third year as well. That workshop was perhaps my central educational experience in learning jazz improvisation. That’s where I came to terms with chord changes and with bebop, which in many ways remains the central jazz idiom, though it has long been eclipsed by other styles. I spent as much time working on tunes I picked up in that workshop as I spent on the courses I was taking the English Department, where I was getting my degree. Of course I also continued playing along with records. I did that a lot, and have done so most of my adult life. I pretty much assume that anyone with a serious interest in jazz does it.

The school also started a big band, which I played in, sharing the lead and second trumpet parts with others. This was led by Milton Marsh. We played standard professional charts, some tunes arranged by Marsh, and maybe even a Frank Foster tune or so, I don’t remember.

Independently of the school I played in a quintet organized by Simon Salz, a guitar player I’d met at the workshop. We only had a handful of gigs, one a New Year’s gig at St. George’s Table, a fairly well-known Buffalo club and restaurant. We were fronted by a female vocalist and the band more or less existed to support her.

I also played in a Saturday afternoon jam session at the home of Mike Fuda, a physics professor at SUNY Buffalo. Mike played drums and there were a handful of other musicians including Ed Wood on bass, a tenor player named, I believe, Sammy Calveteri, and his friend, Angelo Briandi, on trumpet. We played a lot of bebop. Sammy was excellent – he'd been a full-time pro at one time – while Angelo was not so good. He played the heads very well, but couldn’t improvise. However, he did have good weed.

These were very informal sessions. We’d show up at Mike’s house in the early afternoon. When enough musicians had shown up, we’d start jamming. If Sammy was there, he’d call the tune. If I didn’t know the melody I’d sit out for the first few choruses and then, when I’d had time to absorb the tune, I’d play a couple of choruses. After we’d played three or four tunes or so we’d stop playing and gather around the dining room table to chat (and smoke weed). Then we’d play some more tunes, break to chat and get high, and so forth.

We did this for fun. We weren’t getting ready for some performance. And, while there were generally others around who weren’t playing in the jam session, we weren’t performing for them. We were just making music and hanging out. I figure that this is the basic, the most fundamental, music-making arrangement. A situation that is clearly divided into performers and audience, that’s a secondary, a derived social arrangement. To the extent that this secondary arrangement predominates in our society, to that extent we have lost our way.

How do we recover that basic situation?

* * * * *

One final note. Late in the Spring of my last year at Buffalo one of my musical compatriots heard of a big party where there’d be a jam session.

“Charlie Keil will be there.”

“Charlie Keil, the Charlie Keil, the man who wrote Urban Blues?”

“Yes.”

“He’s here at UB?”

“Yes.”

I’m not reporting the exact words of the conversation. I’m just making them up. But something like that conversation took place. I was rather taken-aback that I’d spent five years at UB and didn’t even know that Charlie Keil was on the faculty there. I’d read Urban Blues sometime late in the 1960s and, like many others, had been bowled over with it. And now I would be jamming with him. Little did I suspect how closely we’d be working together in the 21st century.

More later.