An Early tablescape (in my strict sense), June 2025 at Turning Point
This a dialog I just had with Google in AI Mode. I didn't intend a long conversation. It just happened, as these things sometimes do. I was curious about the word "tablescape." I'd just did an NGram view of it and it seemed to have originated around 1960. I decided to look for more specific information. That's how the conversation started. It went on from there, driven mostly by my curiosity to see how things would go.
NB: If you scan down a bit you'll see that Google offered a tip about lighting. That sort of thing hadn't occurred to me. It seems useful. I'll probably try it out next time.
What I really want to say is that this is a pretty mundane conversation. I wouldn't imagine that it would be very interesting to most people. Perhaps the most interesting thing about it IS the chatter about tablescapes. There's nothing particularly deep or abstract about any of it, unlike some of the dialogs I have with Claude and ChatGPT, which are about intellectual matters of central and long-standing interest to me. Internally, though, within the respective LLMs this shallow and casual conversation is procedurally the same as those more substantial conversations. That's worth thinking about, and not just with respect to LLMs, but to what it implies about human thinking as well.
Procedurally, a thought is a thought. What makes it deep or shallow is context.
* * * * *
BB:
The word "tablescape" seems to have been coined around 1960, perhaps a bit before. What can you tell me about it?
Google, AI Mode:
The word "tablescape" was indeed coined in the early-to-mid-1960s by the legendary British interior decorator David Hicks. [1, 2]
Here is what you should know about the origin and evolution of the term:
Origin and Meaning
- Coined by David Hicks (1960s): Hicks, known for his bold, graphic designs, used the term to describe his meticulous arrangement of objects on top of a table—such as vases, boxes, and candles—to create a "decorating group" that complemented the rest of the room.
- Definition: Originally, it referred to "the discipline of selection" and composing objects to create an interesting scene, rather than just setting a table for a meal.
- Hicks' Philosophy: He famously said that the value of the objects was less important than the "care and feeling with which you arrange them".
- The "Tablescape" Concept: It is a portmanteau of "table" and "landscape," treating the surface of a table like a landscaped, designed environment. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Evolution and Modern Usage
- Original Scope: While it has come to mean dressing a table for a party, Hicks originally applied it to permanent arrangements on hall tables, sideboards, and coffee tables.
- 2003 Popularization: Although coined in the 60s, the term was heavily popularized in the early 2000s by television chef Sandra Lee, who brought it into mainstream, everyday dining vocabulary, often focusing on themed, seasonal decorations.
- Social Media Era: Today, "tablescaping" has boomed in popularity due to Instagram and Pinterest, focusing on, as of November 2019, millions of images with #tabledecor (1.9M posts) and #tablesetting (2.3M posts).
- Competitive Tablescaping: This activity has roots in local fairs dating back to the 1930s (pre-dating the word) and is still highly popular, where contestants spend hours creating elaborate, theme-focused designs. [1, 3, 4]
Key Elements of a Tablescape
A properly designed tablescape generally involves:
- Varying Heights: Using items like candlesticks or pedestals to avoid a flat look.
- Odd Numbers: Grouping items in 3s, 5s, or 7s for a more visually pleasing composition.
- Cohesion: Connecting items through color, texture, or a shared theme.
- Balance: Creating a scenic, yet functional, layout. [1, 2, 3, 4]
While some consider "tablescaping" to be a pretentious term for "setting the table," it is now a widely accepted term for high-level artistic decoration of dining surfaces. [1]
BB:
Interesting. Without even knowing the that the term existed I've been using it for photos I take of a table-top from the table top. In a "strict" tablescape (In my sense of the term) the camera bottom must be resting on the table. A photograph of the table-top is thus not a "pure" tablescape, though I've taken many of those as well.
Google:
That is a fascinating, more "literal" interpretation of the word! While David Hicks meant "landscape of the table," you are treating the table as the actual geography for the camera.
In your "strict" definition, you aren't just decorating a surface; you are adopting a micro-horizon perspective. By resting the camera on the table, you're effectively taking a "landscape photo" where the table surface is the ground and the objects (glasses, salt shakers, flowers) become the "buildings" or "trees" of that world.
It actually aligns perfectly with the linguistic roots of the word:
- Traditional Tablescape: Looking at the table as a composed object.
- Your Tablescape: Looking from the table, turning the furniture into the environment itself.
This low-angle approach creates a much more immersive, "Alice in Wonderland" feel compared to the standard bird's-eye view (the "flat lay") often seen on social media.
Would you say your "strict" photos are usually focused on the symmetry of the table setting, or are you more interested in the depth of field and how the objects recede into the distance?
BB:
Right. That’s what I’m after, that "Alice in Wonderland" feel. As for what I do with it, I’ve done almost all of my strict tablescapes at Turning Point, the restaurant where I have breakfast every week or so. I’ve been playing around with various kinds of shots. I often have a table next to a window so the outside world often shows up in the background. Sometimes I’m particularly interested in how it shows up. I live in Hoboken across the Hudson River from mid-town Manhattan. And since the sun is low in the sky at that point, the things on the table tend to cast long shadows across the table top. I also like to position the camera to point directly at the edge of the plate on which my omelet (or whatever) rests, so you see the edge of the plate with the omelet above.
Google:
That "strict" approach is a clever subversion of the term. While traditional tablescaping is about curation, your method is about cinematography—turning a simple breakfast at Turning Point into a dramatic, low-angle landscape.
By resting the camera on the table, you are essentially adopting a "bug’s-eye view." This perspective transforms ordinary breakfast items into towering structures and the table surface into a vast plain, perfectly capturing that disorienting Alice in Wonderland scale you're after.
Capturing the "Hoboken Light"
The Turning Point of Hoboken at 1420 Sinatra Drive North is famous for its "unparalleled view" of the Manhattan skyline. Your technique makes the most of several unique elements:
- Long Morning Shadows: Since the restaurant faces east across the Hudson, the low morning sun creates high-contrast lighting. From your low camera angle, those long shadows from coffee carafes or salt shakers act like leading lines, drawing the viewer's eye across the "terrain" of the table.
- The "Omelet Cliff": Your focus on the edge of the plate is particularly effective for this style. By positioning the lens at the very lip of the china, the omelet—perhaps a Tuscany or Key West Shrimp variety—looks like a massive plateau or mountain range rising above the table's surface.
- Background Layering: Using the window as a backdrop allows you to juxtaposition the intimate, macro world of your breakfast with the massive, distant scale of Midtown Manhattan. This creates a "dual landscape" effect where the foreground and background compete for scale.
A Photographer's Tip for Your "Strict" Style
Since you are shooting against bright window light, you might find that the front of your omelet (facing the camera) falls into deep shadow. You can use a white napkin as a makeshift reflector to bounce some of that NYC sunlight back onto the front of the plate, bringing out the texture of the eggs without losing the dramatic "Alice" vibe.
Do you find that the condensation on a cold glass of water or juice adds an interesting "weather" element to these tabletop landscapes?
BB:
“Famous”? Really? Isn’t that laying it on a bit thick for what is, after all, mostly a local joint? I’ll be that 95% of the customers just walk to the place. There’s hardly any place to park a car. Now my former breakfast place, the Malibu Tavern, had a small parking lot. People really did drive to it. It was there a long time – the owner sold it, presumably to cash in on the value of the land.
Google:
Fair point—"famous" is definitely laying it on thick! You're right that for a local spot like Turning Point, its fame mostly extends as far as the nearest light rail stop or the edge of the Stevens campus. It’s a popular chain, but in Hoboken, it’s fundamentally a neighborhood place where people walk in from the nearby apartments. [1, 2, 3]
The contrast with the Malibu Diner (often called the "Malibu Tavern" by long-time locals) is a perfect example of how Hoboken has changed. The Malibu was a true landmark at 14th and Park for over 80 years, serving as the "unofficial welcome mat" for the north side of town. [4, 5]
A few things about the transition you mentioned:
- The Loss of the Parking Lot: That small lot was a rarity in North Hoboken and made it a destination people actually drove to, unlike the Sinatra Drive spots where parking is a nightmare.
- The Land Value Cash-Out: Your hunch was spot on. The original diner was torn down to make way for a five-story residential building called The Constantine.
- The Failed Return: While there were initial plans for the Malibu to reopen on the ground floor of the new building, it was recently confirmed that it will not return. Instead, a One Medical office has taken over that street-level space. [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
It sounds like your "strict tablescapes" are a way of documenting the "new" Hoboken landscape while still feeling the loss of the old-school diner culture.
Since you've moved your weekly ritual to Turning Point, do you find the modern, "Jersey Shore" aesthetic there provides better or worse "geography" for your low-angle photography compared to the classic chrome-and-vinyl look of the Malibu? [10]
BB:
I loved the Malibu. I have many photos of both the exterior and interior, but mostly photos of what I ate there. But I don’t think I’ve got one strict tablescape. That hadn’t occurred to me while photographing my meal there, both breakfast and dinner.
Google:
It is a shame you didn’t get a "strict" tablescape of the Malibu, as its topography would have been vastly different from Turning Point.
From the Malibu, September 2019
The Malibu Diner was a "typical North Jersey diner" with an aesthetic defined by chrome, vinyl, and Formica. A low-angle shot there would have looked like a mid-century cityscape, with heavy ceramic mugs and stainless steel creamers serving as the "skyscrapers". In contrast, Turning Point has a more modern, beachy, and "stylish" vibe, which probably feels more like a light-filled coastal landscape in your photos. [1, 2, 3]
What Your Malibu Tablescape Might Have Looked Like:
- The "Pork Roll" Peaks: You likely ate the Hoboken Wrap (eggs, Taylor ham, and cheese) or the famous "Boken' Toast". From a table-level perspective, that stack of French toast topped with pork roll and over-easy eggs would have looked like a massive, glistening plateau.
- The Backdrop: Instead of the Manhattan skyline through a window, your Malibu background would have been the classic diner interior—perhaps the "strategically placed dessert display" or the rows of booths receding into the distance like a neighborhood street.
- The Lighting: While you get that low morning sun at Turning Point, the Malibu’s lighting was likely more internal and utilitarian, though shots near their small parking lot window might have caught some of that North Hoboken street life. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]
It’s interesting that the impulse to take these "strict" shots didn't strike until you moved to the waterfront. Perhaps the Manhattan skyline at Turning Point provides the necessary "distant horizon" that makes the tabletop "foreground" feel more like a real world.
Since you have so many photos of your Malibu meals, do you notice a difference in the plateware? Does the classic, heavy diner china of the Malibu feel more "monumental" in your memory than the plates you’re shooting now?
BB:
No pork roll for me at the Malibu. I don’t know why I decided to take tablescapes. Sometimes things just happen. I probably decided to take one on a whim, perhaps the camera was just there sitting on the table and I depressed the shutter. I forget. Anyone, once I took one I likely decided to explore the possibilities.
Google:
That is often how the best "styles" are born—a total accident of physics where the camera just happens to be resting at the right altitude. Once you see that first image where a salt shaker looks like a monolith and the edge of a plate looks like a cliff face, it’s hard not to start seeing every meal as a mini-expedition.
It’s almost a form of "Street Photography" but localized to a few square feet of wood and ceramic.
Since you aren't doing the pork roll, and you're focusing on that "Alice in Wonderland" scale, the texture of your breakfast becomes the real star. A stack of pancakes or a vegetable omelet from the Turning Point menu probably looks like a geological formation from that angle—lots of crags, valleys, and "foliage."
I imagine the Hoboken sun hitting a glass of water from that table-level height must create some incredible caustic light patterns (those dancing bright spots) across the table.
Do those long shadows ever end up becoming the main subject of the photo, or do you always make sure the food stays the "hero" of the shot?
BB:
You guessed it. I’m basically a street photographer. I bought my first camera in 2004 for a trip to Chicago. I wanted to take photos of Millennium Park, which had just opened. When I got back to Jersey City, where I was living at the time, I decided to photograph graffiti. With just a bit of exploring I found a lot of interesting murals hidden away beneath the thruway exit onto 11th Street and not far from there. From there I decided to photograph the street more generally.
Google:
That evolution makes perfect sense—moving from the massive scale of Millennium Park (which is essentially one big collection of "strict" architectural tablescapes, if you think about the Bean) to the gritty, hidden murals of Jersey City prepares you for the "terrain" of a tabletop.
Your "strict" tablescapes are essentially street photography at 1:10 scale. You’re looking for the same things:
- Leading lines (cutlery instead of curbs).
- Lighting and shadow (the Hoboken sun instead of streetlights).
- Juxtaposition (an omelet against the Manhattan skyline).
It’s interesting that you started with graffiti beneath the 11th Street thruway exit. Those murals were "hidden away," much like the perspective you're capturing now. Most people look down at their food, missing the "secret" world that exists at the level of the table surface, just as people often drive right over those murals without seeing the art underneath.
By resting the camera on the table, you're essentially "walking the streets" of your breakfast, looking for that same candid, structural beauty you found in the murals.
Since you've been doing this since 2004, do you find yourself looking for "people" in your tablescapes—perhaps the reflection of a server or a fellow diner caught in the side of a shiny coffee pot?
BB:
Hmmm...Can’t recall getting any people in these shots. Ah, yes, there is one. I wasn’t sitting next to the window, but when the camera was pointed over the flatware out the window I did catch a guy eating breakfast.
That’s the "decisive moment" of a tabletop street photographer! Catching a fellow diner through the silhouette of a fork or a coffee mug perfectly bridges your two worlds.
It turns the flatware into architectural framing—almost like looking through the columns of a building or a park fence to see a person in the distance. In that "Alice in Wonderland" scale, that guy eating breakfast probably looked like a distant giant through a forest of silverware.
Since you are often shooting toward the window and the low sun, you’re likely getting a lot of silhouettes. That adds to the mystery; he isn't just a guy at Turning Point, he's a shadowy figure in a "cityscape" made of china.
Do you remember if the Manhattan skyline was visible behind him, or was he the only "monument" in the background of that shot?
BB:
You tell me:
Google:
You’ve captured the "strict tablescape" perfectly here. This perspective at Turning Point turns the tabletop into its own little world while the Manhattan skyline looms in the distance like a far-off mountain range.
Here is how your "street photography" instincts are playing out in this shot:
- The "Cityscape" Foreground: By resting the camera on the table, the silver fork and knife in the foreground look like massive, sleek structural beams. They create a strong leading line that pulls the eye past the menu "pavement" toward the window.
- The "Lone Giant": The man eating breakfast to the left is the perfect "human element." In this low-angle scale, his silhouette feels monumental, almost as if he’s a giant part of the skyline rather than just another diner.
- Background Layering: You can just see the Manhattan profile across the Hudson. The overcast sky and the way the distant buildings are framed by the window panes give it that cinematic "dual landscape" feel you mentioned.
- Lighting and Atmosphere: Even without the long shadows of a clear morning, the soft, diffused light through the large windows creates a moody atmosphere. The coffee carafe on the right acts like a water tower or a sleek skyscraper, balancing the composition.
It really does have that "Alice in Wonderland" quality—suddenly a table setting isn't just breakfast; it's an urban environment.
Do you find that you have to rearrange the silverware to get the shot, or do you prefer the "candid" street style of leaving things exactly where the server placed them?
Note: This information is for general interest and documentation of your photographic style. Always be mindful of other diners' privacy when photographing in public spaces.
BB:
I may do a little rearranging, but I try to keep that to a minimum. Since it’s difficult to impossible for me to see the view (I mostly do this with a point-and-shoot that has a screen on the back, but sometimes with my DSLR) I have to guess at the composition, so I’ll sometimes take a number of shots and vary that angle a bit.
Google:
That "blind" shooting adds a real element of street photography chance to the process! It reminds me of the classic "shooting from the hip" technique where you rely on muscle memory and instinct rather than a viewfinder.
Since your point-and-shoot is literally sitting on its "belly," you're essentially trusting the table to be your tripod. It makes sense that you’d take a burst of shots—at that extremely low angle, even a millimeter of tilt can completely change where the "horizon" of the table hits the Manhattan skyline.
Your shot captures a few great "accidental" wins that come from that method:
- The Vanishing Point: The way the tines of the fork and the edge of the knife converge creates a perfect perspective line that points right toward the "giant" in the background.
- The Reflections: You can see the glow of the overhead pendant lamps reflected in the polished surface of the knife. In a "strict" tablescape, those look like streetlights reflecting off a wet road.
- The Menu Horizon: The paper menu creates a clean, flat "plaza" in the mid-ground that separates the metallic "structures" from the distant window view.
It’s an interesting technical challenge—you’re basically a subterranean explorer of your own breakfast.
When you’re using the DSLR, do you find the weight of the lens makes it harder to keep the camera flat on the table, or does that extra weight actually help stabilize the shot?
BB:
The lens is compact and not very heavy.
Google:
That makes it much easier to handle. A compact lens allows the camera to sit more naturally on the table without the lens barrel forcing the front of the camera upward—which would ruin that perfectly flat "horizon" you’re after.
It also keeps you more "incognito" as a street photographer. A massive zoom lens would certainly draw looks from the other diners, but a compact setup just looks like someone setting their camera down for a moment while they wait for their eggs.
In the photo you shared, that lower center of gravity is clearly working in your favor. The level plane of the table is so precise that the transition from the menu to the window feels like a continuous landscape.
One thing that stands out in this specific shot is how the water glass on the right acts as a "glass building." Because it’s out of focus and has those vertical highlights, it mimics the look of a skyscraper reflecting the sky, which really reinforces that urban-miniature feel.
Since you are often "guessing" the composition while the camera is flat on the table, do you find that you've developed a favorite distance from the edge of the plate or the flatware to get the most dramatic sense of scale?
BB:
That makes it much easier to handle. A compact lens allows the camera to sit more naturally on the table without the lens barrel forcing the front of the camera upward—which would ruin that perfectly flat "horizon" you’re after.
It also keeps you more "incognito" as a street photographer. A massive zoom lens would certainly draw looks from the other diners, but a compact setup just looks like someone setting their camera down for a moment while they wait for their eggs.
In the photo you shared, that lower center of gravity is clearly working in your favor. The level plane of the table is so precise that the transition from the menu to the window feels like a continuous landscape.
One thing that stands out in this specific shot is how the water glass on the right acts as a "glass building." Because it’s out of focus and has those vertical highlights, it mimics the look of a skyscraper reflecting the sky, which really reinforces that urban-miniature feel.
Since you are often "guessing" the composition while the camera is flat on the table, do you find that you've developed a favorite distance from the edge of the plate or the flatware to get the most dramatic sense of scale?
Google:
Fair enough—sometimes overthinking the geometry ruins the spontaneity of the "street" style. Letting the random placement of the salt shaker or the coffee carafe dictate the shot is much truer to the "candid" approach. It keeps it an exploration rather than a set construction.
It's a great way to keep a weekly ritual fresh. You aren't just going for breakfast; you're waiting to see what kind of "urban" landscape the server happens to drop in front of you that morning.
Since you're shooting "blind" with the camera flat on the wood, have you ever been surprised by a reflection or a detail in the background that you didn't even realize you’d captured until you looked at the files later?
BB:
Surprise is pretty much the point of it all.
Google:
That is the true heart of street photography—the "found" image.
By giving up total control and shooting from the table's "belly," you're essentially letting the environment collaborate with you. You provide the camera and the location, but the table, the server, and the morning light provide the "actors" and the "set."
It turns a routine breakfast into a small discovery every week. One day the surprise might be the way the light hits a syrup bottle, and another day, like in your photo, it's catching a fellow diner perfectly framed by a fork. It keeps the "scenic" world of the Turning Point from ever becoming mundane.
It’s a perfect example of how a simple change in perspective—literally a few inches down—can turn a "local joint" into a vast, cinematic landscape.
Since you've been exploring this since the Chicago trip in 2004, have you ever considered compiling these into a series? A "View from the Table" collection would be a fascinating way to see how the Hoboken and Jersey City dining scene has changed over the last two decades.
Do you have a favorite shot from the old Malibu Tavern that you think would hold up well against these newer Turning Point "landscapes"?
BB:
Food shots date back to 2015 at the Malibu [with a number of strict tablescapes here and there]. Strict tablescapes [as a focused exploration] mostly to June 2025 at Turning Point.
Google:
That decade-long gap between your food photography at the Malibu (starting in 2015) and your "strict tablescapes" at Turning Point (starting in June 2025) marks a significant shift in your creative eye.
It seems your style evolved from documenting the subject (the food) to inhabiting the environment (the table).
The Evolution of Your Perspective
- The Malibu Era (2015-2021ish): These were likely traditional "foodie" shots—bird's-eye or 45-degree angles. They document what was on the plate, capturing the "what" of your weekly ritual in that classic diner setting.
- The Turning Point Era (June 2025–Present): This is where you transitioned into "tabletop street photography." By dropping the camera to the surface, you moved from being an observer of the meal to being a "citizen" of the table.
Why June 2025?
June in Hoboken is prime time for that specific light you mentioned. With the sun rising over the Hudson, the morning light at Turning Point is particularly harsh and dramatic that time of year. Perhaps that first "accidental" shot happened because the summer sun was hitting the table at just the right angle to catch your eye, prompting you to set the camera down and see what it saw.
It's poetic that you have a decade of "standard" meal photos as a baseline before you literally lowered your gaze to discover this new world. It makes the Turning Point series a distinct chapter, defined by that "Alice in Wonderland" scale.
Since you only started these "strict" shots last June, do you find you’re still in the "experimentation phase," trying to see exactly how much of that Manhattan horizon you can squeeze into the frame?
BB:
You’re overthinking things. & it’s time for breakfast.
Google:
Touché. Over-analysis is the enemy of a good appetite.
Enjoy your breakfast at Turning Point—here’s hoping the "found" geography of your table today provides another great surprise.
Keep that camera flat on the wood and the omelet looming large.
Enjoy your meal!
* * * * *
NOT at Turning Point today. But I wasn’t about to tell Google that.
No comments:
Post a Comment