David Robson, Why some people are impossibly talented, BBC Worklife, 18 Nov 2019:
Examples:
When examining the lives of historical polymaths, he [Waqas Ahmed] only considered those who had made significant contributions to at least three fields, such as Leonardo da Vinci (the artist, inventor and anatomist), Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (the great writer who also studied botany, physics and mineralogy) and Florence Nightingale (who, besides founding modern nursing, was also an accomplished statistician and theologian).
Characteristics of polymaths:
As you might expect, higher-than-average intelligence certainly helps. “To a large degree that facilitates or catalyses learning,” says Ahmed. But open-mindedness and curiosity were also essential. “So you're interested in a phenomenon but you don't care where your investigation leads you,” Ahmed explains, even if that pushes you to delve into unfamiliar territory. The polymaths were also often self-reliant – happy to teach themselves – and individualist; they were driven by a great desire for personal fulfilment.
These qualities were also combined with a more holistic view of the world. “The polymath not only moves between different spheres or different fields and disciplines, but seeks fundamental connections between those fields, so as to give them a unique insight into each of them,” says Ahmed.
Nobel-level scientists are likely to be artists as well:
As David Epstein has also reported in his recent book Range, influential scientists are much more likely to have diverse interests outside their primary area of research than the average scientist, for instance. Studies have found that Nobel Prize-winning scientists are about 25 times more likely to sing, dance or act than the average scientist. They are also 17 times more likely to create visual art, 12 times more likely to write poetry and four times more likely to be a musician.
The brain needs variety:
There is now a growing recognition that, when concentrating on any complex endeavour, the brain often reaches a kind of saturation point, after which your attention may fade and any extra effort may fail to pay off. But if you turn to another, unrelated activity, you may find that you are better able to apply yourself. Shifting between different kinds of tasks can therefore boost your overall productivity.
Jean Piaget was the consummate polymath. More currently maybe Stuart A. Kauffman, whose "Reinventing the Sacred" demonstrates remarkable erudition. I suspect William Condon was a quiet polymath also. Professor Condon just may have discovered a fundamental unit of behavior in his kinesics research, by viewing 5 minutes of high speed film repeatedly for 10 years. A mathematician needs to apply what Condon discovered to computers.
ReplyDeletePiaget was a main influence on me.
DeleteDitto.
DeleteAs was Bill Condon.
Though in very different ways. I know of Condon for one idea, and it took awhile for that one to really sink in, but when it did, it became foundational. Piaget, well, he wrote a lot of books, and I've read a hefty handful. But it then end, perhaps with him it was one idea as well, developmental stages of cognition.
Delete