Is that where we’re headed, to a bipolar world dominated by America and China? I just asked Google Search: “Is China the largest economy in the world?” Its reply:
China is the world's largest economy when measured by Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), but the United States is the largest in terms of nominal Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
- By Purchasing Power Parity (PPP): China is the world's largest economy, with an estimated output exceeding $44 trillion. This metric adjusts for the cost of living and the price of local goods, reflecting a higher real volume of economic activity.
- By Nominal GDP: The United States holds the top spot. In current market exchange rates, the U.S. economy is valued at approximately $32 trillion, while China's nominal GDP is roughly $20 trillion.
So that’s one thing. The other is AI. America and China are in a race for dominance in AI. America has a technical lead, but with respect to Frontier LLMs, that lead is measured in months, not years. And China is making its models open weight while the most advanced American models (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google) and not open. It’s not at all clear how that will shake out.
With the Trump administration authoritarianism is on the rise in America. While the Democrats may well win the next presidential election, it’s not at all clear what that means for America’s already precarious democracy. The problem is that a great deal of power is concentrated in the hands of political and business elites, so much that America’s democracy looks like a chess game played by oligarchs where ordinary Americans are the pawns.
Is that what the world will become in 2040, a competition between American and Chinese oligarchs in which everyone else is a pawn, with Homo economicus triumphant over all?
OT.
ReplyDeleteHad to post this somewhere.
Wow. Never thought of ... "perhaps we need two different kinds of quotation marks, syntactic and semantic."
I now want special quote marks.
"Ernst himself suggested that perhaps we need two different kinds of quotation marks, syntactic and semantic. See Boolos’ Logic, Logic, and Logic (1998) for his own thoughts on the matter.
(Thanks, Dan.)
https://www.futilitycloset.com/2026/07/20/ernsts-paradox/
"Logic, Logic and Logic" by George Boolos
Alasdair Urquhart
1999, Philosophy in Review, Vol. 19, 244-246
Download PDF
https://www.academia.edu/2139571/_Logic_Logic_and_Logic_by_George_Boolos
SD